ArticlePloS one2025
Implementation and survey evaluation of a new safety concern escalation pathway among nursing team members.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEscalating patient safety concerns is a critical component of healthcare delivery and can be impeded by organizational barriers including power hierarchies and fear of retaliation. Nursing team members are pivotal in identifying and addressing real-time safety issues. The existing literature on increasing "speaking-up" behaviors among nursing team members predominantly focuses on communication training rather than simplifying the escalation process. The current project aimed to evaluate the awareness and perceptions of a newly implemented pathway to streamline concern escalation among nursing team members at a tertiary academic medical center. Although the pathway was embraced and regularly utilized by nursing supervisors, we sought to determine whether front-line staff were aware of, and confident in, the use of the pathway.
methodsA new escalation pathway for communicating concerns was developed and implemented in response to a patient safety event and subsequent root cause analysis. An investigator-developed electronic survey was distributed to nursing team members and assessed (1) demographic data, (2) experiences with escalating safety concerns, and (3) awareness, use, and attitudes toward the new pathway. Recruitment and data collection occurred in two stages, and responses were collected via REDCap. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis of free-text response items.
results128 of 129 total responses were analyzed. Of 89 (69.5%) participants who indicated they had ever encountered a situation requiring escalation, 48 of them (53.9%; 37.5% of all respondents) reported hesitating to act because they were uncertain how to escalate the concern. 25.6% of respondents had already used the new pathway for escalating concerns, and 79% thought they would use the pathway in the future. However, 41% expressed ambivalence about its impact on their confidence in escalating concerns and 47% were still unsure how to use the matrix/pathway. Thematic analysis of 51 free-text response items identified five key themes which provided useful provided useful insights to guide ongoing education and support for the escalation process.
conclusionThe new escalation pathway was positively received and improved confidence for many, though some gaps in awareness and training persist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.