Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41144425›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Standardized protocol for laboratory rearing and breeding of the Lymnaeidae snail, Radix natalensis (Krauss, 1848).

Agrippa Dube, Chester Kalinda, Tawanda Manyangadze, Tendai Makoni, Moses John Chimbari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agrippa DubeSchool of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Howard College Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2714-1594
Chester KalindaSchool of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Howard College Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8144-0248
Tawanda ManyangadzeSchool of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Howard College Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Tendai MakoniDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Great Zimbabwe University, Masvingo, Zimbabwe.
Moses John ChimbariSchool of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Howard College Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshwater lymnaeid snails are involved in the transmission of fascioliasis in tropical and subtropical Africa, Asia, as well as in temperate regions. This study improved and standardized laboratory rearing and breeding of first-generation (F1) R. natalensis using field-collected F0 snails. Ninety field-collected R. natalensis adult snails with shell heights of 4-5 mm were divided into three experimental treatment groups: A, B, and C. Each experimental treatment group comprised of ten (10) 2L containers, with each containing 3 snails. Group A, the control, was fed Elodea sp. weed powder and Cyperus papyrus twigs from snail-sampling sites as oviposition material. Group A containers were filled with water from the snail sample sites. Spring-watered snails in experimental group B were fed with dried lettuce, fish flakes, and eggshells. In experimental group C, snails were fed with algal wafers and trout pellets in dechlorinated water. Groups B and C used polystyrene strips for oviposition. Daily snail mortality and egg mass counts were obtained. Experimental group B snails produced 69 egg masses and 500 F1 offspring with the lowest snail mortality (13%). Group C produced 60 egg masses and 450 F1 offspring. The mortality rate in this group was 20%. Group A control snails laid 10 eggs and 48 F1 offspring. Also, mortality (66%) was higher in this group. Mean egg masses differed significantly between groups A and B (Group A: 0.85 ± 0.22 egg masses; Group B: 2.33 ± 0.53, p = 0.034) and A and C (Group A: 0.85 ± 0.22 egg masses; Group C: 2.16 ± 0.48, p = 0.041), but not between groups B and C. Treatment differences explained 11.4% (F1, 25 = 4.36, p = 0.047) of egg mass variability. The median snail survival in group B was 8.11 days versus 4.57 days in group A. Significant differences in median survival time were observed between experimental groups (Log Rank X² = 9.87, p = 0.007). Group B had the highest fecundity and lowest mortality among the treatment groups. However, the use of spring water increased the costs of mass breeding of snails using this approach. On the other hand, experimental group C produced a comparable number of egg masses. Thus, for mass breeding of R. natalensis, the use of an experimental approach from group C would be recommended as it is cheaper.

Indexed as

BreedingSnailsAnimalsFemaleOviposition

Identifiers

PMID41144425
PMCPMC12558528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.