ArticlePloS one2025
Speed encoding in the rat striatum.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The striatum plays a central role in motor control, yet how it dynamically represents variables such as locomotion speed, particularly across varying behavioral contexts, remains incompletely understood. Here, we investigated striatal encoding of locomotion speed in rats performing an automated T-maze task. We found that the activity of most (78%) analyzed striatal neurons- referred to as speed cells-was robustly correlated, either positively or negatively, with locomotion speed. This population included both putative medium spiny neurons (MSNs; 74%) and fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs; 82%). Speed-related activity was remarkably stable, showing no significant influence of elapsed time, cue type, spatial choice, or trial outcome. Additionally, positively correlated MSNs tended to precede speed changes, while positively correlated FSI activity typically followed, as did negatively correlated neurons for both types. This suggests distinct roles for different striatal cells in movement modulation. Speed cells exhibited strong modulation at movement onset and offset, yet also maintained correlations with speed throughout locomotion bouts. Finally, the firing rates of speed cells reliably predicted locomotion speed, outperforming non-speed cells and chance levels; decoding accuracy further improved when data from multiple neurons were combined, consistent with a population code. Together, these results demonstrate a robust, context-independent representation of locomotion speed in the rat striatum, driven by diverse cell types, and extends previous findings to a task with greater cognitive demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.