Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41144319›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026

A novel analysis methodology for assessment of re-identification risks for the National Cancer Institute cancer registry privacy preserving record linkage technique.

Murat Kantarcioglu, Will Howe, Benmei Liu, Valentina Petkov, Esmeralda Casas-Silva, Diana Velasquez-Kolnik, Bradley A Malin, Lynne Penberthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Murat KantarciogluDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9795-9063
Will HoweInformation Management Services, Inc., Calverton, MD 20705, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-4227-5217
Benmei LiuSurveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0096-139X
Valentina PetkovSurveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-8297-5381
Esmeralda Casas-SilvaCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9704-0812
Diana Velasquez-KolnikFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21701, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-1866-6281
Bradley A MalinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3040-5175
Lynne PenberthySurveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9372-9869

Funding

National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute HHSN26100038NCI NIH HHS HHSN26100038NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003INIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe National Cancer Institute (NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) supports efforts to address critical challenges in advancing cancer research. As part of this effort, NCI sponsored the development of a privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) software that transforms identifying patient information into multiple tokens through a set of cryptographically secure keyed hash functions. This project aims to evaluate the PPRL software in the perspective of re-identification risks and propose effective strategies to sufficiently mitigate these risks. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo achieve the goals, we developed a novel re-identification risk assessment framework, based on token frequency analysis, to estimate the privacy impact of hashed tokens shared for record linkage. We assessed privacy risk through empirical analysis on a state-level voter registration database, a public dataset commonly used for re-identification, under various scenarios. These scenarios are defined based on several factors, including the size of the dataset used for linkage and a group size parameter that determines when an adversary can claim that a record has been re-identified.

resultsWe found that the re-identification risk based on frequency analysis attack is approximately 0.0002 (ie, 2 patients out of 10 000 are potentially identifiable) under reasonable adversarial settings, with a group size parameter of k = 12 and a dataset size of 400 000 patients. Additionally, our analysis reveals a negative correlation between dataset size and re-identification risk. DISCUSSION: Re-identification risk is deemed low for the new NCI PPRL software. Token frequency analysis provides a reliable estimate of the re-identification risk in token-based PPRL tools.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityConfidentialityMedical Record LinkageNeoplasmsRegistriesSoftwareElectronic Health RecordsHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Risk AssessmentUnited Statesdata integrationprivacyprivate record linkage

Identifiers

PMID41144319
PMCPMC12981660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.