Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41144299›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2025

"Beyond the bubble"-a mixed-methods evaluation of an online psychosocial pilot program for caregivers of children with life-threatening food allergies.

Eszter Bertalan, Zsolt Horváth, Nikolett Beáta Vadon, Edina Ágnes Tóth, Csenge Tóth, András Zsolt Lázár, Csilla Csáki, Tímea Magyaródi, Adrien Rigó

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eszter BertalanDoctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8341-2008
Zsolt HorváthInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9088-8186
Nikolett Beáta VadonDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Edina Ágnes TóthInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Csenge TóthInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
András Zsolt LázárInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Csilla CsákiDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Pulmonology Center of the Reformed Church in Hungary, Törökbálint, Hungary.
Tímea MagyaródiInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Adrien RigóInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

EKÖP-24 University Excellence Scholarship ProgramEKÖP-24 University Excellence Scholarship Program of the Ministry for Culture and Innovation from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation FundMinistry for Culture and InnovationNational Research, Development and Innovation FundNational Research, Development, and Innovation Office STARTING 150862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveParents of children with immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergies (FA) at risk of anaphylaxis may experience an increased psychosocial burden. Thus, integrating psychosocial support for parents into FA management is essential. Previous psychosocial interventions have demonstrated positive effects for caregivers of children with FA. This study aimed to implement a comprehensive online pilot program for caregivers of children aged 2-8 years diagnosed with FA that carries a risk of anaphylaxis. The primary objectives related to the intervention were to assess quantitative changes in FA-specific parental self-efficacy and burden, stress, and well-being; explore qualitatively the parents' experiences; and evaluate overall impressions.

methodsA mixed-method, single-arm, non-randomized, pre-post measurement design was used in which an online, six-session-long pilot intervention was conducted among mothers of children with FA. Quantitative methods (N = 25) included administration of self-report questionnaires pre- and post-intervention. Semi-structured interviews on individual intervention experiences (N = 11) were qualitatively analyzed by using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA).

resultsPaired-samples t-test indicated significant improvements for FA-specific parental self-efficacy and burden, while non-significant changes were observed for stress and well-being. Increases in self-efficacy were greater among parents who had not previously experienced an anaphylactic event. IPA revealed beneficial shifts in acknowledging and sharing burdensome emotions and parental challenges, while perceived limited changes in social environment's FA management. Professionally facilitated peer support and psychological techniques acquired during the program were identified as major drivers of observed changes.

conclusionsPreliminary improvements in FA-specific parental outcomes and high perceived usefulness were observed; however, a rigorously designed definitive trial is needed to establish the program's effectiveness.

Indexed as

CaregiversFood HypersensitivityMothersParentsPsychosocial InterventionAdultAnaphylaxisChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSelf EfficacyStress, Psychologicalanaphylaxiscaregiversfood allergymixed methodspilot program

Identifiers

PMID41144299
PMCPMC12755084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.