ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
Biases in an artificial intelligence image-generator's depictions of healthy aging and Alzheimer's.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bias, representation, and clinical fidelity in AI-generated images for medical education: a systematic literature review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis content analysis study investigates potential biases in image generation by 2 artificial intelligence (AI) tools, DALL-E 3 and Midjourney, in portraying older adults and individuals living with dementia. Despite widespread use of generative AI in various sectors, there is limited research on how these models might perpetuate stereotypes and stigmatization through their images. MATERIALS AND
methods1056 images were generated using specified prompts categorized into 3 groups: general older adults, dementia-related, and control. Each prompt began with "photorealistic portrait" followed by specific scene descriptions. Four researchers conducted content analysis on each generated image, focusing on factors, such as portrait style, setting, posture, apparent sex of subjects, and emotional affect. The analysis was executed with blinding and randomization protocols to ensure unbiased assessment. Chi-square tests examined the relationship between prompt categories and variables.
resultsResults revealed significant disparities in depictions of older adults and those with dementia compared with control images. Both models more often portrayed subjects in response to dementia-related prompts with negative affect, in less favorable emotional states. However, DALL-E 3 also generated more personas displaying positive affect in response to these prompts. Variations in depiction styles between the 2 AI models were noted, with DALL-E 3 showing a broader diversity of outputs. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThe findings highlight AI's potential to reinforce stigmatizing stereotypes through biased image generation. Recommendations include selecting prompts carefully to avoid negative depictions and advocating for greater AI explainability and inclusivity by design. Future research should explore other AI models, other forms of bias, and strategies to mitigate biases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.