ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2025
Ultra-thin (<2 µm) silicon carbide free-standing membranes as beam position monitors for soft and tender X-ray beamlines.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monolithic integration of SiC diode detectors into scanning X-ray microscopy optical elements for in situ beam diagnostics.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
- SiC resistive X-ray beam monitor for intensity and position control of synchrotron light.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional beam intensity monitor technologies, such as `gold-meshes' and `diamond conductive thin films', currently applied to tender and soft X-ray beams, encounter numerous application challenges, including diffraction effects, low signal strength, non-uniform transparency, and lack of position information. This study explores the potential of very thin (<2 µm) silicon carbide free-standing membranes, as in-line, minimally interfering beam intensity and position monitors, with high-lateral resolution, for soft and tender X-ray beamlines. Initial experimental assessments were conducted at the NanoMAX beamline at MAX IV to analyze the performance of such very thin devices in monitoring tightly focused (<1 µm FWHM) beams. The tests revealed that employing four-quadrant sensor layouts on such thin sensors resulted in significant charge collection losses in the regions between the quadrants and, under high electric field conditions, in charge multiplication effects (avalanche effects). Through Sentaurus TCAD theoretical simulations, the limitations of the four-quadrant design for such applications and the potential of an alternative technology (resistive X-ray beam postion monitor) were clarified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.