ArticleCarcinogenesis2025
Summary of radiation effects on incidence of solid cancers in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors: 1958-2009.
Article in Carcinogenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Health Status in Populations Living in the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site Region: Results of Screening.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of age- and gender-specific reference intervals for the triglyceride-glucose index in a large Chinese healthy adult population.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Elevated SASP Factors, Reduced Antioxidant Enzymes, and Increased Tumor Susceptibility in Space Radiation-ExposedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Eighty years of cancer research after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.Carcinogenesis · 2025Article
- Impact of a Short-Term High-Fat Diet on Lifespan and Tumorigenesis After Early-Life Exposure to Radiation.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper concludes the third comprehensive report on radiation effects on solid cancer incidence within the Life Span Study (LSS) cohort of Japanese atomic bomb survivors, adding 11 years of follow-up. Over 1958-2009, 22 538 solid cancer cases and 3.1 million person-years were identified among 105 444 individuals. The study utilized improved radiation doses (DS02R1), updated migration probabilities, and adjustments for smoking and lifestyle factors. Poisson regression was used to model excess relative risk (ERR) and excess absolute rate (EAR) per 1 Gy for all-solid cancers combined and specific sites. Among females, a linear dose-response model best described all-solid cancer risk [ERR = 0.64 Gy-1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52-0.77], whereas among males, a linear-quadratic model with upward curvature provided the best fit (ERR = 0.20 at 1 Gy, 95% CI: 0.12-0.28). Radiation-associated ERR declined with attained age, more rapidly in males than in females, while EAR increased with age. Independently, radiation-associated ERR and EAR decreased with age at exposure. A significant dose-response was identified for prostate cancer for the first time; for brain and central nervous system tumors, female pancreatic, and uterine corpus cancers dose-response reached statistical significance. A new age-at-exposure pattern emerged for female breast and uterine corpus cancers, suggesting that radiation-associated risk increased as exposure age approached menarche (∼age 15), decreasing at older exposure ages. Most cancers exhibited linear dose-response, except non-melanoma skin, bone and joint, esophageal, and kidney parenchyma cancers in males. Sixty-four years post-exposure, solid cancer risks remain elevated, reinforcing the LSS's critical role in unraveling lifetime cancer effects of a-bomb radiation after exposure at various ages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.