ReviewCarcinogenesis2025
Genomic landscape of radiation-induced somatic mutations in a normal cell.
Review in Carcinogenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Somatic mutation profiles in aged military nuclear test veterans: A comparative whole-genome sequence study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Eighty years of cancer research after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.Carcinogenesis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atomic bomb survivors have been found to have an excess risk of late adverse effects, including leukemia, various solid cancers, and non-cancer diseases, depending on the dose of radiation exposure. Radiation-induced DNA damage can lead to errors in DNA repair, resulting in the induction of somatic mutations in cells. Since these mutations are thought to contribute to an increased risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis, various approaches, such as mutation analysis at specific genetic loci and chromosomal analysis, have been used to investigate their characteristics. However, previous methods were only capable of detecting a subset of radiation-induced mutations, making it difficult to quantitatively and comprehensively capture their specificity, including the mutation spectrum. Recently, whole-genome sequencing combined with of ex vivo single-cell culture has enabled a comprehensive analysis of radiation-induced mutations in individual cells. Such studies, including our own, have demonstrated that short, non-repeat deletions occurring outside of tandem repeats represent the most distinctive signature of radiation-induced mutagenesis, showing clear dose dependence and consistency across multiple tissues. Structural variants (excluding retroelement insertions) and multisite mutations also showed radiation specificity, albeit to a lesser extent and at a lower frequency than non-repeat deletions. These findings may offer insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying radiation-induced oncogenesis and non-cancer disease development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.