Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41144259›Full record

ReviewCarcinogenesis2025

Recent evolution of risk analyses in atomic bomb survivor studies: new methods and applications.

John Cologne, Munechika Misumi, Hanna Lindner, Zhenqiu Liu, Richard Sposto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Carcinogenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John CologneDepartment of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima 732-0815, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1540-6639
Munechika MisumiDepartment of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima 732-0815, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2698-4880
Hanna LindnerDepartment of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima 732-0815, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4769-6490
Zhenqiu LiuDepartment of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima 732-0815, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3052-9151
Richard SpostoDepartment of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima 732-0815, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2729-2360

Funding

Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and WelfareNational Academy of SciencesRadiation Effects Research FoundationUS Department of Energy DE-HS0000031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several decades ago a dramatic leap forward occurred in the development and application of statistical methods for modeling radiation risk at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF). Poisson regression analysis for grouped person-year cohort data and the linear excess relative risk model were introduced, and subsequently a devoted software system, Epicure® (https://www.hirosoft.com), was developed by researchers at RERF and at the U.S. National Cancer Institute. Numerous advancements in understanding radiation effects on humans were made possible with these methods, which are still the state-of-the-art for risk assessment at RERF and have remained part of the standard toolbox for radiation-and other environmental-epidemiological studies worldwide. Nevertheless, as our understanding of radiation risk has increased, so have the breadth and depth of questions that require answers based on emerging data that are not amenable to these conventional methods. This overview briefly recounts the conventional methods and then describes our recent diversification into the use or development of new statistical approaches to meet the challenges of burgeoning biological data and emerging mechanistic information. We briefly discuss the development and application of new methods, current and planned, that are part of the RERF Statistics Department's role in supporting institution-wide research, especially in our collaborations involving the Life Span Study, Adult Health Study, and First-generation Offspring Clinical Study. Some approaches to modeling and assessing radiation risk with newer methods mentioned herein have already been published, while some are still in development or are only beginning at the proposal stage.

Indexed as

Atomic Bomb SurvivorsNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedHumansNuclear WeaponsRisk Assessmentatomic-bomb survivorsradiation riskstatistical methods

Identifiers

PMID41144259
PMCPMC12558145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.