ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026
Optimizing flow-diverting stent configurations for aneurysm treatment: a computational approach integrating deep learning and differential evolution optimization.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An aneurysm, enlargement of an artery or vein, weakens the surrounding vascular wall, making it susceptible to rupture and the possibility of life-threatening bleeding, ultimately resulting in death. The placement of flow-diverting stents is a highly utilized and effective method for treating aneurysms. This study presents a novel approach combining CFD simulations, deep neural networks (DNN), and differential evolution optimization (DEO) to optimize hemodynamic conditions in aneurysms. Initially, CFD simulations were conducted to generate a comprehensive dataset of 2,700 simulations with various stent configurations. This dataset was then used to train a DNN model, enabling accurate predictions of velocity, vorticity, and wall shear stress for any stent configuration. The model demonstrated consistent and reliable performance across different configurations. DEO was applied to identify the optimal stent, resulting in a configuration with seven struts. The optimal strut sizes were 0.3184, 0.9599, 0.7889, 0.9599, 1.0073, 1.0073, and 2.9283, with gap sizes of 0.2238, 0.5897, 0.3379, 0.2996, 0.2052, 0.0371, and 0.3068 between the struts. This configuration achieved superior performance in reducing velocity, vorticity, and maximum wall shear stress. The study demonstrated that increasing the number of struts, with a concentration at the proximal aneurysm neck, enhanced flow diversion and minimized hemodynamic risks, especially in regions vulnerable to rupture. Validation through additional CFD simulations confirmed the effectiveness of the optimized stent, demonstrating the potential of the proposed methodology to improve stent design and hemodynamic outcomes in aneurysm treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41144179What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.