ArticleScience China. Life sciences2025
Receptor affinity-selective differential dynamics of membrane fusion initiation govern deltacoronavirus cross-species transmission.
Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neutralizing epitope mapping for deltacoronavirus receptor-binding domain and seroepidemiological survey across different animal species.Virulence · 2026Article
- Diversity and distinctive characteristics of the global RNA virome in urban and peri-urban environments.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Insectivores exhibit superior microbial network connectivity and elevated zoonotic risk by 2035 relative to rodents and bats.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Cell entry mechanisms of porcine enteric coronaviruses.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) exploits both human aminopeptidase N (hAPN) and porcine APN (pAPN) as receptors, with a higher affinity for hAPN than for pAPN through conserved interaction sites. However, despite this affinity, PDCoV is rarely pathogenic to humans, suggesting that the utilization dynamics of APN homologs by PDCoV are distinct, which is crucial in cross-species transmission but poorly understood. Here, we employed single-virus tracking to visualize and dissect the entry dynamics of PDCoV facilitated by APN. It was discovered that APN homologs bind PDCoV simultaneously, yet the times required for the initiation of membrane fusion and internalization differ significantly. Although high-affinity hAPN, rather than low-affinity pAPN, accompanies PDCoV during internalization, low-affinity pAPN initiates PDCoV internalization approximately 20 s faster than high-affinity hAPN, with caveolae-mediated endocytosis being more predominant and productive. Depending on the cell species, low-affinity pAPN induced a 5% to 25% greater proportion and a 0.6 to 4.3 min faster cell surface fusion, contributing to efficient infection. In contrast, high-affinity hAPN resulted in a 5% to 25% greater proportion and a 5 to 15 min faster endosomal fusion, potentially promoting immune evasion. We further demonstrated that the binding affinities between the PDCoV receptor-binding domain (RBD) and APN homologs are key determinants of the differential kinetics, driving flexible transitions between the two fusion pathways. This receptor affinity-selective PDCoV entry kinetics evolves an optimal balance of immune evasion and rapid infection, underscoring the potential for PDCoV interspecies transmission and the need for its vigilant surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41144156What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.