Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41144156›Full record

ArticleScience China. Life sciences2025

Receptor affinity-selective differential dynamics of membrane fusion initiation govern deltacoronavirus cross-species transmission.

Da An, Qi Peng, Yong-Hao Ma, Wenguang Hong, Yi Pei, Shiyu Liu, Yan Li, Jizong Li, Yanke Shan, Yulong Yin and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cell entry mechanisms of porcine enteric coronaviruses.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Da AnJoint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety of Ministry of Education, Single Molecule Biochemistry & Biomedicine Laboratory (Sinmolab), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Qi PengJiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Ministry of Science and Technology, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Yong-Hao MaJoint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety of Ministry of Education, Single Molecule Biochemistry & Biomedicine Laboratory (Sinmolab), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Wenguang HongJoint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety of Ministry of Education, Single Molecule Biochemistry & Biomedicine Laboratory (Sinmolab), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yi PeiJoint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety of Ministry of Education, Single Molecule Biochemistry & Biomedicine Laboratory (Sinmolab), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Shiyu LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Ministry of Science and Technology, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Yan LiJoint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety of Ministry of Education, Single Molecule Biochemistry & Biomedicine Laboratory (Sinmolab), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Jizong LiJiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Ministry of Science and Technology, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Yanke ShanJoint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety of Ministry of Education, Single Molecule Biochemistry & Biomedicine Laboratory (Sinmolab), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China. shanyk26@njau.edu.cn.
Yulong YinInstitute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, 410125, China. yinyulong@isa.ac.cn.
Bin LiJiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Ministry of Science and Technology, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China. libinana@126.com.
Fei LiuJoint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety of Ministry of Education, Single Molecule Biochemistry & Biomedicine Laboratory (Sinmolab), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China. feiliu24@njau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) exploits both human aminopeptidase N (hAPN) and porcine APN (pAPN) as receptors, with a higher affinity for hAPN than for pAPN through conserved interaction sites. However, despite this affinity, PDCoV is rarely pathogenic to humans, suggesting that the utilization dynamics of APN homologs by PDCoV are distinct, which is crucial in cross-species transmission but poorly understood. Here, we employed single-virus tracking to visualize and dissect the entry dynamics of PDCoV facilitated by APN. It was discovered that APN homologs bind PDCoV simultaneously, yet the times required for the initiation of membrane fusion and internalization differ significantly. Although high-affinity hAPN, rather than low-affinity pAPN, accompanies PDCoV during internalization, low-affinity pAPN initiates PDCoV internalization approximately 20 s faster than high-affinity hAPN, with caveolae-mediated endocytosis being more predominant and productive. Depending on the cell species, low-affinity pAPN induced a 5% to 25% greater proportion and a 0.6 to 4.3 min faster cell surface fusion, contributing to efficient infection. In contrast, high-affinity hAPN resulted in a 5% to 25% greater proportion and a 5 to 15 min faster endosomal fusion, potentially promoting immune evasion. We further demonstrated that the binding affinities between the PDCoV receptor-binding domain (RBD) and APN homologs are key determinants of the differential kinetics, driving flexible transitions between the two fusion pathways. This receptor affinity-selective PDCoV entry kinetics evolves an optimal balance of immune evasion and rapid infection, underscoring the potential for PDCoV interspecies transmission and the need for its vigilant surveillance.

Indexed as

CD13 AntigensCoronavirus InfectionsDeltacoronavirusMembrane FusionReceptors, VirusSwine DiseasesVirus InternalizationAnimalsEndocytosisHumansSwineCD13 AntigensReceptors, Viruscross-species transmissiondeltacoronavirusdifferential dynamicsinternalizationmembrane fusionsingle-virus tracking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.