ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty under local anesthesia: A robotic segment-specific analysis of puncture accuracy and clinical outcomes.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application research of navigation system-assisted vertebroplasty for the treatment of lumbar osteoporotic compression fractures.BMC surgery · 2026Trial
- Development and validation of a predictive model for puncture accuracy in robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty under local anesthesia.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of robotic guidance into spinal procedures is designed to enhance precision and overcome anatomical challenges. Robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) represents a significant advancement in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). However, its performance under local anesthesia can be influenced by factors such as respiratory motion, patient cooperation, and anatomical variations across spinal segments, potentially leading to differences in puncture accuracy and operational efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the segment-specific differences in puncture accuracy, operational efficiency, and clinical outcomes of robot-assisted PVP performed under local anesthesia. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 312 patients with 312 fractured vertebrae who underwent robot-assisted PVP under local anesthesia between June 2023 and December 2024. Given the low incidence of OVCFs in the upper thoracic spine, patients were stratified into four groups based on the treated vertebral level: T1-8 (n = 26), T9-12 (n = 98), L1-3 (n = 142), and L4-5 (n = 46). Outcomes included puncture accuracy (assessed using the Gertzbein and Robbins scale), operational times (registration/planning, working channel establishment, total surgical duration), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and complication rates. The L1-3 group exhibited the shortest working channel establishment time (3.5 ± 0.8 min) and the highest puncture accuracy (96.5% grades A + B). The T1-8 group required the longest registration/planning time (8.5 ± 2.0 min) and demonstrated the lowest puncture accuracy (69.2% grades A + B), which was attributable to respiratory artifacts and complex anatomy. All groups showed significant and comparable improvements in VAS and ODI scores postoperatively (P < 0.001), with no significant differences in complication rates (P > 0.05). Robot-assisted PVP under local anesthesia is an effective and safe treatment for OVCFs across all segments. However, significant segment-specific variations exist in puncture accuracy and operational efficiency. The upper thoracic spine (T1-8) presents the greatest technical challenges, necessitating meticulous preoperative planning and potential technological adaptations to mitigate the impact of respiratory motion and the complex anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41144109What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.