ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Stage-Specific outcomes of robotic transvaginal NOTES hysterectomy in endometriosis: A comparative study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Initiating robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a Beginner's guide.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective was to assess outcomes of robotic-assisted transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (RA-vNOTES) performed for hysterectomy and endometriosis excision. We conducted a retrospective case series across two hospitals belonging to the same academic tertiary institution in Houston, Texas, USA. From August 2019 to April 2025, RA-vNOTES hysterectomy with endometriosis resection was performed in 274 patients with stage I-IV disease, classified according to the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) system. Of the 274 patients, 131 were classified as stage I, 56 as stage II, 46 as stage III, and 41 as stage IV endometriosis. Hysterectomy time, total operative time, and estimated intraoperative blood loss were associated with stage of endometriosis (all p < 0.05). Median total operative time was 132 min for stage I, 147 min for stage II, 166 min for stage III, and 222 min for stage IV disease. Through a RA-VNOTES approach, we could address an obliterated posterior cul-de-sac and complete all necessary procedures for excision of endometriosis, including lysis of adhesions, retrograde ureterolysis, complete peritonectomy, cystectomy of endometriomas, appendectomy, bowel shaving, and bowel discoid excision. Three cases were converted to abdominal robotic surgery for bowel resection and reanastomosis, ureteral reimplantation, and excision of diaphragmatic endometriosis. All patients had a significant improvement in VAS pain score pre- to post-surgery. Overall complication rates were low. RA-vNOTES offers a safe and practical method for endometriosis excision while providing the patient with the profits of the most minimally invasive approach - with complications being rare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41144064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.