ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
The association between carotid artery perivascular fat density and Covert brain infarction following carotid endarterectomy.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Covert brain infarction (CBI) is a common complication after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and is associated with cognitive decline. Carotid artery perivascular fat density (PFD) reflects the severity of inflammation around the artery and is also related to plaque vulnerability. This study aimed to investigate the association between PFD and CBI in patients undergoing CEA. A total of 185 patients who underwent CEA were enrolled. PFD was measured using computed tomography angiography (CTA), and CBI was assessed on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Baseline characteristics, plaque features, and PFD were compared between patients with and without CBI. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between PFD and CBI, adjusting for confounding factors. Among 185 patients, 45 (24.3%) had CBI. Patients with CBI had significantly higher PFD (-41.46 ± 8.12 Hounsfield Units [HU]) compared to those without CBI (-59.95 ± 10.13 HU; P < 0.001). In logistic regression, PFD was associated with CBI (OR: 1.203, 95% CI: 1.139-1.271; P < 0.001). After adjustment in three models, this association remained significant independently. The optimal PFD cutoff for predicting CBI was - 51.7 Hu, with a sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 84.3%. Higher PFD was significantly associated with an increased risk of CBI following CEA. PFD may serve as a novel imaging marker for predicting CBI, aiding in preoperative risk assessment and patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41144058What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.