ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2025
Research on 3D-printed scaffolds with microstructure bio-inspired optimization for orbital bone defect repair.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polyhydroxyalkanoates in Bone Alloplastic Materials: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Polymers · 2026Review
- Synthesis and evaluation of resveratrol-cerium modified hydroxyapatite for enhanced bone repair scaffolds.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Integrated Analysis of an Innovative Composite Polycaprolactone Membrane and a Jason Membrane in Guided Bone Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical compatibility is a major challenge in designing orbital bone scaffolds, which involving material selection, structural design and fabrication processes. In this study, a novel impact model database containing essential components involved in tissue engineering repair of orbital fracture was established for finite element analysis (FEA). The mechanical compatibility between various pattern-designed scaffold and the orbital bone defect site was tested to raise the optimized square pattern filled scaffold for the subsequent study. Based on the optimized structure, 3D printed bone scaffolds with different β-TCP contents were fabricated. It was confirmed that the composite scaffold containing 30% β-TCP and 70% polycaprolactone (PCL@30TCP) demonstrated significantly enhanced hydrophilicity, mechanical strength, water absorption, and accelerated degradation relative to other groups (p < 0.05). In vitro evaluations confirmed the significant advantages in cytocompatibility and osteogenic activity of PCL@30TCP scaffold (p < 0.05). Furthermore, rabbit orbital defect repair experiments demonstrated that the 3D-printed PCL@30TCP scaffold markedly promoted osteogenesis at the defect site through three synergistic mechanisms: enhancing neo-bone formation and maturation, guiding tissue growth into the interior structure of scaffold, and obviously upregulating bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and osteocalcin (OCN) expression (p < 0.05). Importantly, comprehensive biosafety assessments validated the clinical applicability of the PCL@30TCP scaffold. These findings indicate that the square-patterned PCL@30TCP 3D-printed scaffold exhibits exceptional osteogenic performance both in vitro and in vivo, demonstrating clinical potential for orbital bone defect repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.