SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Determinants of diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic outcomes of SEEG in epilepsy: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a cornerstone in the presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Despite its growing adoption, variability in outcomes and complication rates suggests the influence of multiple technical, institutional, and contextual factors. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251065875). Six databases were searched up to July 2024. Eligible studies included original research in English or Spanish reporting on SEEG procedures in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, with outcomes related to diagnostic accuracy, complications, and therapeutic interventions. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively across five thematic domains. Fifty studies involving 6,054 patients were included. Most were retrospective and conducted in high-income countries. Epileptogenic zone (EZ) identification rates ranged from 11.6% to 100%, with over 30 studies reporting rates ≥ 90%. A total of 465 SEEG-related complications were reported, predominantly intracranial hemorrhages. Lower complication rates were observed in high-volume centers using robotic or frame-based systems. Post-SEEG interventions, primarily surgical resections, led to favorable outcomes, with Engel Class I achieved in 551 patients. Institutional experience and access to advanced technologies emerged as key determinants of safety and efficacy. SEEG is a highly effective diagnostic and therapeutic modality in epilepsy surgery. However, its performance is strongly influenced by surgical expertise, procedural planning, and institutional context. Standardizing protocols, expanding training, and improving access in underserved regions are essential to optimize outcomes and ensure equitable care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41144046What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.