ArticleMycorrhiza2025
Differential impacts of Funneliformis Mosseae and Rhizophagus intraradices on the rice rhizosphere microbiome, nutrient availability, and yield in paddy fields.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While the positive impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on rice growth has been well documented, the specific mechanisms by which different AMF species regulate rice growth and the rhizosphere microecosystem are not fully understood. This research investigated two AMF species, Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri), to elucidate their effects on rice rhizosphere soil characteristics, microbial community structure, and rice yield. Field experiments showed that treatment with Fm resulted in significantly yields (26.96%) compared to Ri (21.19%). Although both AMF species significantly increased mycorrhizal colonization rates compared to the control (Fm: 78.23%, Ri: 70.13% at maturity), they induced distinct improvements in soil properties. Specifically, Fm significantly boosted soil enzyme activities, increasing urease and cellulase activities by 47.29% and 24.62%, respectively, compared to Ri, Conversely, Ri promoted the accumulation of soil available phosphorus (69.81% higher than Fm). Additionally, the two AMF strains influenced the rhizosphere microbial community through different regulatory mechanisms. Fm significantly enriched bacterial taxa related to carbon cycling, such as Chloroflexota and Actinomycetota. Ri not only significantly increased microbial α-diversity but also specifically enriched bacterial function groups related to sulfur cycling. Crucially, the two AMF species optimized interactions between AMF, rice plants, and rhizosphere microorganisms via different structural modifications. Under Fm, fungal community network modularity was significantly higher, while the bacterial network under Ri treatment exhibited stronger connectivity. This study elucidates the distinct mechanisms by which AMF species synergistically enhance rhizosphere soil microenvironmental quality and increase rice yield. These findings provide a theoretical basis for the sustainable management of rice fields and suggest new directions for developing environmentally friendly agricultural technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41144038What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.