ReviewJournal of neurology2025
Emerging issues in the management of patients with disorders of consciousness.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of arousal promotion and cortical plasticity induced by multi-target transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Emotional Processing after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Insights from Functional MRI and Pupillometry.Neurotrauma reportsArticle
- Towards the use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy as an assessment tool in disorders of consciousness.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disorders of consciousness (DoC), including coma, the vegetative state (VS, also termed unresponsive wakefulness syndrome), and the minimally conscious state (MCS), are some of the most complex and misunderstood conditions in modern medicine. Advances in acute medical care have increased survival rates dramatically following severe brain injury, yet diagnosis and management remain fraught with uncertainty due to the heterogeneity and complexity of these difficult conditions. Prognostication is often imprecise, treatment options are limited, and decisions about ongoing care raise challenging ethical questions. In recent years, however, a growing body of neuroimaging evidence has challenged long-held assumptions about this group of patients, providing new methods for detecting covert awareness as well as novel techniques for more accurately predicting the likelihood and extent of functional and neurological recovery. Here, we provide an update on key emerging themes in this field, with a focus on diagnostic challenges, advances in neuroimaging, clinical implementation of advanced neuroimaging, therapeutic management, and the evolving ethical landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41144027What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.