Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41144027›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2025

Emerging issues in the management of patients with disorders of consciousness.

Karnig Kazazian, Adrian M Owen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karnig KazazianWestern Institute of Neuroscience, Western University, Western Interdisciplinary Research Building, Room 6112, London, ON, Canada. kkazazia@uwo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-601X
Adrian M OwenWestern Institute of Neuroscience, Western University, Western Interdisciplinary Research Building, Room 6112, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disorders of consciousness (DoC), including coma, the vegetative state (VS, also termed unresponsive wakefulness syndrome), and the minimally conscious state (MCS), are some of the most complex and misunderstood conditions in modern medicine. Advances in acute medical care have increased survival rates dramatically following severe brain injury, yet diagnosis and management remain fraught with uncertainty due to the heterogeneity and complexity of these difficult conditions. Prognostication is often imprecise, treatment options are limited, and decisions about ongoing care raise challenging ethical questions. In recent years, however, a growing body of neuroimaging evidence has challenged long-held assumptions about this group of patients, providing new methods for detecting covert awareness as well as novel techniques for more accurately predicting the likelihood and extent of functional and neurological recovery. Here, we provide an update on key emerging themes in this field, with a focus on diagnostic challenges, advances in neuroimaging, clinical implementation of advanced neuroimaging, therapeutic management, and the evolving ethical landscape.

Indexed as

Consciousness DisordersDisease ManagementHumansNeuroimagingComaDisorders of consciousnessElectroencephalographyFunctional MRIMinimally conscious stateVegetative state

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.