ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Effect of Er:YAG Laser with or without fluoride on the prevention and progression of erosive tooth wear in primary enamel: an in vitro study.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the effect of the Er:YAG laser, either alone or in combination with topical fluoride application, on the prevention and progression of erosive tooth wear in primary enamel. A total of 120 extracted human primary molars were flattened, polished, and divided based on substrate condition: sound or previously eroded with citric acid. The specimens were allocated into 12 experimental groups and received one of the following treatments: no treatment (control), topical application of acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF 1.23%), irradiation with Er: YAG laser using two different protocols (0.20 W and 0.40 W), or combinations of laser followed by fluoride application. All samples were then subjected to a five-day erosive remineralization cycling protocol, involving repeated acid exposure (pH 2.6) and immersion in artificial saliva. Enamel surface loss was assessed by optical profilometry, and morphological changes were evaluated by environmental scanning electron microscopy. The findings demonstrated that all interventions tested, including laser irradiation, fluoride application, and their combinations, were effective in reducing enamel loss when compared to untreated controls. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the various treatment protocols. The results suggest a promising protective effect of Er: YAG laser and fluoride treatments for preventing and controlling the progression of erosive tooth wear in primary enamel, highlighting the need for further research to confirm their efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41144026What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.