ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Deep learning-based vessel and nerve recognition model for lateral lymph node dissection: a retrospective feasibility study.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a model for predicting central lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer based on CT textural features and clinical indicators.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Feasibility of using artificial intelligence models to identify the obturator nerve in laparoscopic selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Evaluating ovarian blood supply anatomy and variability via digital subtraction angiography in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy undergoing uterine artery embolization.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The Emerging Role of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence in Urological Surgery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer is challenging because of the presence of blood vessels and nerves essential for postoperative genitourinary function and leg movements. Identifying these structures during surgery is crucial. We developed a deep learning-based semantic segmentation model to recognize and visualize critical anatomical structures during laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection automatically.
methodsIntraoperative video data from laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissections performed on 22 patients between 2018 and 2021 were used. Specific scenes from the beginning to end of the procedures were extracted and divided into still images, which were annotated to delineate the external iliac artery, external iliac vein, and obturator nerve. The model was trained with pixel-level annotation labels, and its performance was evaluated using precision, recall, and the Dice coefficient through five-fold cross-validation.
resultsOverall, 992 images were extracted from 22 lateral lymph node dissection videos. The Dice coefficient values were 0.789 (± 0.009), 0.736 (± 0.033), and 0.574 (± 0.082) for the obturator nerve, external iliac artery, and external iliac vein, respectively. The model's inference speed was 12.7 fps, corresponding to processing one still image in 0.08 s, enabling near real-time intraoperative analysis.
conclusionThe deep learning-based semantic segmentation model automatically recognized the obturator nerve, external iliac artery, and external iliac vein during laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection, achieving reasonable segmentation accuracy as measured by the Dice coefficient. This technology will be used as a foundation for developing surgical navigation systems to improve the safety and efficiency of lateral lymph node dissection procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.