ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2026
Assessment of protein incorporation into SBA-15 particles and their structural changes.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The MOlecular-Scale Biophysics Research Infrastructure (MOSBRI) Project and its Outcomes.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ordered mesoporous silica SBA-15 is a promising platform for protein immobilization and delivery, since adsorption into its porous matrix may improve protein structural stability. Here, three proteins-myoglobin (Mb), concanavalin A (ConA), and soybean trypsin inhibitor (STI)-were loaded into conventional SBA-15 particles with an average mesopore diameter of 9.3 nm to investigate structural changes in their predominant content after adsorption. Powdered biocomposites were prepared by loading each protein at two silica-to-protein weight ratios (10:1 and 5:1). Protein structures were evaluated by synchrotron radiation circular dichroism and fluorescence spectroscopy following resuspension in buffer solutions (pH 7.0 and 2.2). The structural changes were qualitatively analyzed and found to be more influenced by the silica-to-protein ratio for Mb and ConA, while buffer pH had a lesser effect on the proteins. A 10:1 ratio better preserved the α-helical spectral features of Mb, whereas a 5:1 ratio favored the retention of the β-sheet signature of ConA; in both cases, the aromatic residue microenvironment remained largely preserved. In contrast, STI, rich in irregular structures, exhibited smaller spectral changes relative to its native structure in both ratios, while the aromatic residue was less exposed to the solvent. Overall, the results reinforce the potential of SBA-15 as a protein carrier by retaining the main features of the protein's secondary structure under specific conditions. The simultaneous comparison of three structurally distinct proteins reveals variable adsorption behaviors and highlights the silica-to-protein ratio as a protein-dependent parameter, reinforcing the importance of optimizing adsorption conditions to develop more stable silica-protein systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41144019What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.