ArticleUrolithiasis2025
Comparison of 24-Hour urine parameters before and after initiation of Metformin in patients with diabetes and urolithiasis: A retrospective analysis.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commentary on "Comparison of 24-Hour urine parameters before and after initiation of Metformin in patients with diabetes and urolithiasis: A retrospective analysis".Urolithiasis · 2026Article
- Comment on "Comparison of 24-Hour urine parameters before and after initiation of metformin in patients with diabetes and urolithiasis: A retrospective analysis".Urolithiasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This retrospective study investigated the impact of metformin initiation on 24-hour urine parameters in patients with diabetes with urolithiasis. Utilizing the Medicare-Litholink database, we analyzed 427 patients who started metformin between two 24-hour urine collections conducted less than 18 months apart. To isolate the effect of metformin on urinary parameters as a surrogate marker of stone growth, we excluded patients taking other oral hypoglycemics or medications known to alter urine composition. Our longitudinal analysis revealed no statistically significant changes in key urinary parameters, including supersaturation of calcium oxalate, supersaturation calcium phosphate, and supersaturation of uric acid. Urine volume showed a significant, albeit clinically minor, increase (2.1 to 2.2 L/day, p = 0.0074). Time-dependent analysis comparing short-term (< 100 days) and long-term (> 296 days) metformin use also showed no significant impact on urine chemistry. Similarly, when controlling dosage of metformin ([Formula: see text]1000 mg/day or > 1000 mg/day) we found no significant impact on urine chemistry. These findings suggest that metformin use is not significantly associated with reduced urinary stone risk factors in patients with diabetes and urolithiasis, thus, failing to support its use among urolithiasis patients with new onset diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.