Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41144006›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2025

Comprehensive analysis of 55,213 stones: understanding common morphological associations advances endoscopic stone recognition and AI integration.

Bruno Turcotte, Jean-Christophe Bernhard, Franck Bladou, Marie Chicaud, Grégoire Robert, Baudouin Denis de Senneville, Michel Daudon, Vincent Estrade

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bruno TurcotteDepartment of Urology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. bruno.turcotte.1@ulaval.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3288-6032
Jean-Christophe BernhardDepartment of Urology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Franck BladouDepartment of Urology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Marie ChicaudDepartment of Urology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Grégoire RobertDepartment of Urology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Baudouin Denis de Senneville *Team MONC, Inria, CNRS UMR 5251, Bordeaux INP, Université de Bordeaux, France, 351 cours de la Libération, Talence Cedex, F-33400, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5284-8474
Michel Daudon *Department of Multidisciplinary Functional Explorations, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
Vincent Estrade *Department of Urology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the prevalence and associations of urinary stone morphologies, focusing on their relevance for Endoscopic Stone Recognition and improving AI-assisted ESR (AESR) systems.

methodsWe analyzed a unique dataset comprising 55,213 stones classified by microscopic examination and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) to assess the prevalence and associations of morphologies. We investigated the probabilities of observing a secondary morphology given a predominant morphology and the probabilities of observing a cross-sectional morphology given a surface morphology. Furthermore, we evaluated the performance of an AESR algorithm in detecting both pure and mixed stones across the six morphologies with a prevalence above 10% (Ia/Ib-Calcium oxalate monohydrate and IIa/IIb-Calcium oxalate dihydrate, IIIb-uric acid, and IVa-carbapatite), using a multi-label classification approach that integrates prior knowledge of common morphological associations.

resultsThis study provides key insights into common and rare urinary stone morphologies in a large cohort. The most frequent morphologies were Ia (55%), IVa (39%), and IIb (36%). We identified clinically relevant associations, notably Ia/Ib → IIb (28-30%), IIb → Ia (48%), and IIa → IVa (43%). We also showed that stone fragmentation often reveals deeper morphologies differing from the surface. In our experimental setup, AESR achieved mean balanced accuracies of 73% for surface images and 77% for section images, compared to 64% and 69% when morphological dependencies were ignored (Monte Carlo cross-validation over 10 random trials with 80% training, 10% validation, and 10% testing subsets).

conclusionsRecognizing the prevalence and interrelationships of stone morphologies is essential for ESR. It improves both urologists' and AESR performance.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEndoscopyUreteroscopyUrinary CalculiHumansArtificial intelligenceEndoscopic stone recognition (ESR)UreteroscopyUrinary stone metabolism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.