ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2025
Impact of Clostridium butyricum HADIG-CB003 dietary supplementation on the gut microbiota of Kunming mice.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of in vitro-activated Clostridium butyricum FW1 on growth performance, intestinal barrier function, and gut microbiota of broilers.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Swine-Derived Probiotics and Their Metabolites as an Alternative to Veterinary Antibiotics.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clostridium butyricum is a key anaerobic probiotic due to its ability to produce butyric acid and form spores. In this study, four strains were isolated from pig feces using tryptose sulfite cycloserine (TSC) plates and specific primers sequentially. The optimal strain, C. butyricum HADIG-CB003, identified via gas chromatography and enzyme tests, produced 1.54 g/L of butyric acid, with cellulase and amylase activities of 20.88 ± 1.27 U/mL and 16.04 ± 0.46 U/mL, respectively. In reinforced clostridial medium, it produced 2.48 L of gas per liter, with hydrogen making up 59.68% (1.48 L). The adhesion rate to porcine intestinal epithelial cells (IEC-J2) was 9.16% in vitro. Twelve 3-week-old male Kunming mice were split into two groups and fed a basal diet with or without 1 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.