Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143966›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Necrotizing fasciitis, part 1 : Possibilities and limitations of imaging diagnostics].

Thomas Grieser

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas GrieserKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland. thomas.grieser@gmx.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapidly progressive and life-threatening soft tissue infection usually caused by bacteria, with a high mortality of up to 80% when untreated. Any delay in time further increases the risk of mortality. Thus, early recognition and treatment are of upmost importance. The clinical assessment, consideration of laboratory results and surgical exploration are important diagnostic procedures. Cross-sectional imaging is highly sensitive with respect to assessment of the extent (computed tomography) and differential diagnostic considerations (magnetic resonance imaging). In individual cases imaging can provide valuable and specific evidence of necrotizing fasciitis, such as deep fascial involvement; however, a major problem arises when diagnostic imaging would lead to a critical delay of urgently needed surgical procedures, but diagnostic uncertainties still exist. For these reasons the diagnostic work-up in necrotizing fasciitis inherently needs a thorough interdisciplinary discussion among experienced specialists.

Indexed as

Fasciitis, NecrotizingMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansComputed tomographyFasciaMagnetic resonance imagingSoft tissue inflammationSurgical procedures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.