ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Differential contributions of global and local object landmarks in human wayfinding behavior.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wayfinding success hinges on the effective processing of landmarks and environmental structures, yet studies examining the functional roles of different landmark types have yielded inconsistent results. This study explored the joint effects of landmark types and environmental structure regularity on wayfinding efficiency by factorially manipulating these variables. Participants navigated through environments with either regular or irregular structures, containing either global or local landmarks. We measured travel durations and paths, finding that both varied according to landmark type and environmental regularity. Notably, during the learning trials when landmarks were visible, both types improved wayfinding in irregular environments but not in regular ones, indicating that the effectiveness of salient cues depends on environmental uncertainty. Conversely, in the probe trial where landmarks were invisible, wayfinding in all environments improved following exposure to local landmarks, but only irregular environments benefited from global landmarks. These findings imply that local and global landmarks are processed and utilized differently, supporting a hierarchical processing model that weights different types of information based on their availability and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41143941What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.