ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Learning curve and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy: a single-center study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-assisted pancreatic necrosectomy for infected pancreatic necrosis secondary to severe acute pancreatitis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic-assisted surgery for choledochal cyst in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To examine the learning curve and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) conducted at a single center and to contextualize these findings against existing literature. A single expert surgical team conducted RDP on 106 patients at the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, from January 2021 to December 2024. To explore the learning pattern of operative duration, cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was utilized. Breakpoints in textbook outcomes (TBO) for RDP were subsequently identified through the application of a two-segment regression model. Perioperative indicators before and after the breakpoints were compared. The cohort showed a median operative time of 230 min, with 74.53% (n = 79) achieving TBO. The cubic regression model (R² = 0.958) provided the best fit for the operative-time learning curve, revealing two discrete operative phases: a premier learning phase (cases 1 - 45) together with a succeeding proficiency phase (cases 46 - 106). The TBO breakpoint occurred at case 85, corresponding to the mastery phase. The proficiency phase yielded marked improvements over the learning phase, including shorter operative times (258 min vs. 200 min), lower intraoperative blood loss (100 mL vs. 75 mL), and a reduced rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III: 13.33% vs. 1.64%) (all P < 0.05). These phase transitions were consistent with benchmark thresholds reported in previous studies. Operative efficiency in RDP improved significantly after 45 cases, suggesting that technical safety and feasibility can be achieved relatively early. However, the attainment of consistent clinical success, as defined by TBO, required approximately 85 cases. Future initiatives should prioritize shortening RDP's learning curve, minimizing early complications, and systematically enhancing surgical quality to ensure safer adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.