Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143937›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2025

Editorial: Bacteriophage therapy in orthopedics-Key questions and emerging answers.

Filippo Migliorini, Fabrizio Rivera, Jörg Eschweiler

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Antibiofilm-coated intramedullary nailing for tibial and femoral diaphyseal fractures at high-risk infection: outcomes of 103 consecutive patients.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Filippo MiglioriniDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Halle, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Street 40, 06097, Halle (Saale), Germany. filippo.migliorini@uk-halle.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7220-1221
Fabrizio RiveraDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ospedale SS Annunziata, ASL CN1, Via Ospedali, 9, 12038, Savigliano, Italy.
Jörg EschweilerDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Halle, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Street 40, 06097, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal infections remain among the most challenging conditions in orthopaedic practice, often requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy, repeated surgical interventions, and extensive rehabilitation. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance and the persistence of bacterial biofilms further complicate management, particularly in chronic osteomyelitis, infected fracture fixations, and periprosthetic joint infections. In this context, bacteriophage therapy has re-emerged as a promising adjunctive strategy. Bacteriophages offer targeted antibacterial activity, including the ability to disrupt biofilms and self-replicate at the site of infection. Contemporary approaches, such as phagograms, customised phage cocktails, and local delivery techniques, have addressed many historical limitations related to phage specificity and accessibility. A growing number of case reports and small clinical series have documented successful applications of phage therapy in orthopaedic infections, with encouraging safety profiles and infection resolution in refractory cases. Early-phase clinical trials are now systematically evaluating the feasibility, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of phage therapy in musculoskeletal settings. Furthermore, synergistic effects with antibiotics and the potential to overcome biofilm-related antibiotic tolerance highlight the added therapeutic value of this approach. While regulatory and manufacturing challenges persist, the integration of bacteriophages into multidisciplinary orthopaedic care marks a paradigm shift toward precision microbiology. Rather than replacing conventional treatment, phage therapy complements surgery and antibiotics, offering a biologically rational and patient-specific adjunct in the fight against recalcitrant infections.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsPhage TherapyProsthesis-Related InfectionsBacteriophagesBiofilmsHumansOrthopedicsOsteomyelitisBacteriaInfectionsMusculoskeletal medicineOrthopaedic surgeryTrauma surgeryVirus

Identifiers

PMID41143937
PMCPMC12559550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.