ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025
Current Surgical Management for Acral Melanoma.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Narrow Excision Margins for Diverse Histological Subtypes of Cutaneous Melanoma in Children and Adults: A Systematic Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementMelanoma is one of the most aggressive and lethal forms of skin cancer, with acral melanoma (AM) associated with the poorer prognosis among melanoma subtypes. Historically, it was considered that more extensive surgery could prolong survival; however, multiple randomized trials have demonstrated that greater surgical intervention does not improve survival. Over the past few years, novel therapeutic agents including immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular-targeted drugs have remarkably improved prognosis of melanoma and potentially reduced the role of surgery. Furthermore, predictive models that integrate clinicopathologic features and gene expression profiling may further optimize patient selection and guidance for surgical de-escalation. In parallel, the use of these agents in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings highlights the need for multimodal approaches combined with surgery. However, the landmark clinical trials have included few cases of AM, which is rare melanoma subtype in Western populations. Because of its unique molecular alterations, the applicability of findings from Western-based clinical trials to AM remains uncertain, leading to a lack of high-level evidence for this subtype. In this article, we review the available, albeit limited, evidence on surgical management for AM and discuss future perspectives and challenges for optimizing treatment strategies for this distinct melanoma subtype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.