Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143918›Full record

ReviewScience progress

Machine learning applications in sports injury prediction: A narrative review.

Jin Yuan, Quanwen Zeng, Jun Li, Zhengzhou Cong, Yong Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jin YuanSchool of Physical Education, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, Anhui, China.ORCID 0009-0004-0907-4812
Quanwen ZengSchool of Physical Education, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, Anhui, China.ORCID 0009-0008-2771-0375
Jun LiSchool of Physical Education, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, Anhui, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2224-4589
Zhengzhou CongSchool of Physical Education, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, Anhui, China.ORCID 0009-0006-6851-419X
Yong ZhangSchool of Physical Education, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, Anhui, China.ORCID 0009-0006-8263-4999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, machine learning (ML) has been increasingly applied to sports injury prediction, offering potential support for the early identification of risk and the optimization of preventive strategies. However, current studies face several key challenges, including the absence of standardized model development procedures and inconsistencies in data preprocessing, feature selection, and model evaluation across investigations. This narrative review systematically searched the literature published up to December 2024 in major databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus) and synthesized the methodological progress in ML-based injury prediction. Specifically, it highlights critical stages in model development, including data preprocessing, feature engineering, model selection and comparison, evaluation metrics, and approaches to interpretability. The findings indicate that, while some ML models demonstrate promising predictive accuracy, their limited interpretability constrains clinical applicability. Furthermore, substantial heterogeneity among the included studies, such as differences in populations, injury sites, and risk factors, limits meaningful comparison of methodological performance. Future research should prioritize external validation in more diverse populations and real-world contexts while advancing interpretability and generalizability, thereby strengthening the translational potential of ML-based injury prediction. This review provides a structured framework and direction for researchers aiming to improve methodological rigor and clinical utility in this emerging field.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesMachine LearningHumansRisk Factorsathletic injuriesMachine learningpredictive modelsrisk assessmentsports medicine

Identifiers

PMID41143918
PMCPMC12575970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.