ReviewScience progress
Machine learning applications in sports injury prediction: A narrative review.
Review in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning Applications in Non-Contact Lower Limb Sports Injury Prediction: A Systematic Review.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in elderly patients with hip fracture: A machine learning model with emphasis on diabetes as a key risk factor.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Reducing Video Verification Burden: Machine Learning Classification of Head Acceleration Events in Youth Football.Research square · 2026Article
- Machine learning framework for predicting athletic injuries and optimising performance.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Key biomechanical features of jump-landing under cognitive dual-task conditions: an XGBoost-SHAP-based explainable machine learning analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- A multimodal deep learning-based model for posture asymmetry recognition and sports injury risk prediction in adolescent table tennis athletes.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Deep learning for genomic insights into athletic performance in sports education.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, machine learning (ML) has been increasingly applied to sports injury prediction, offering potential support for the early identification of risk and the optimization of preventive strategies. However, current studies face several key challenges, including the absence of standardized model development procedures and inconsistencies in data preprocessing, feature selection, and model evaluation across investigations. This narrative review systematically searched the literature published up to December 2024 in major databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus) and synthesized the methodological progress in ML-based injury prediction. Specifically, it highlights critical stages in model development, including data preprocessing, feature engineering, model selection and comparison, evaluation metrics, and approaches to interpretability. The findings indicate that, while some ML models demonstrate promising predictive accuracy, their limited interpretability constrains clinical applicability. Furthermore, substantial heterogeneity among the included studies, such as differences in populations, injury sites, and risk factors, limits meaningful comparison of methodological performance. Future research should prioritize external validation in more diverse populations and real-world contexts while advancing interpretability and generalizability, thereby strengthening the translational potential of ML-based injury prediction. This review provides a structured framework and direction for researchers aiming to improve methodological rigor and clinical utility in this emerging field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.