ArticleScience progress
Lightweight data protection framework for secure edge transmission using IOTA-MAM.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Centralized security architectures and conventional encryption methods are often cumbersome for edge computing environments, where lightweight, efficient, and real-time processing is essential. This study proposes a lightweight data protection framework for secure edge transmission using IOTA-MAM. The solution uses IOTA to enhance data integrity, prevent tampering, and protect privacy at the edge. The Masked Authenticated Messaging protocol is optimized for more efficient batch message generation, delivery, and verification, reducing computational and communication burdens, particularly for edge devices with limited resources. When assessed under high load-2400 edge nodes managing 80,000 tasks-the system achieves an 85.7% recall rate, 11.2% task failure rate, and average service latency of 6.5 s. The results indicate that the proposed framework balances security, throughput, and latency, providing robust privacy and integrity guarantees while reducing operational overhead. This work contributes to a practical and scalable solution that meets the security and responsiveness demands of modern edge computing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.