Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143882›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026

Follow-on osteoporosis therapy after denosumab discontinuation among Medicare beneficiaries.

Selvam R Sendhil, Suzanne M Cadarette, Sulbh Aggarwal, Arman Oganisian, Andrew R Zullo, Sarah D Berry, Michael A Adegboye, Kaleen N Hayes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Selvam R SendhilDepartment of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA. Selvam_Sendhil@brown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8010-4296
Suzanne M CadaretteLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Sulbh AggarwalLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Arman OganisianDepartment of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Andrew R ZulloDepartment of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Sarah D BerryHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Michael A AdegboyeDepartment of Health Services, Policy, and Practice and Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Kaleen N HayesDepartment of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

Benefits and Harms of Long-term Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy: Impact of Treatment Length, Type, Switching, and HolidaysR01AG078759 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CADARETTE, SUZANNE, HAYES, KALEEN NICOLE · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078759NIA NIH HHS R01AG078759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denosumab is an effective osteoporosis therapy, but discontinuing treatment can result in rebound-associated fractures. Guidelines recommend starting follow-on osteoporosis therapy within 6 months of the last dose, but real-world practice is under-described. We found only 6.0% of patients initiated follow-on therapy within 1 year after denosumab discontinuation, suggesting many are at increased fracture risk. PURPOSE: We aimed to describe the incidence and predictors of follow-on osteoporosis therapy use for US Medicare beneficiaries who discontinued denosumab.

methodsIn this cohort study, we identified patients who initiated denosumab (60 mg) between 2010 and 2021 from a 20% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Denosumab discontinuation was defined as 60-day gap in use. During follow-up through 2022, we identified beneficiaries with follow-on osteoporosis therapy (i.e., oral and intravenous bisphosphonates, teriparatide, and abaloparatide) within 1 year after denosumab discontinuation. Multinomial logistic regression with marginal standardization was used to estimate risk ratios with 95% confidence limits for associations between covariates and follow-on therapy use after denosumab discontinuation.

resultsOf 120,952 denosumab initiators, we identified 82,519 individuals (mean age = 79.1 years [SD = 7.2]; 90.3% female) who discontinued denosumab. Only 4912 (6.0%) individuals initiated follow-on therapy after discontinuation; mean time from discontinuation (last claim + 243 days) to follow-on therapy initiation was 3.3 months [SD = 3.4]. Alendronate (n = 3014; 3.7%), zoledronic acid (n = 687; 0.8%), and ibandronate (n = 581; 0.7%) were most common. Most people did not initiate follow-on therapy (43.9%) or reinitiated denosumab after a gap (41.3%), with 8.8% lost to follow-up. Younger age (vs. ≥ 85 years), female sex, prior osteoporosis therapy, and Having 1-2 denosumab claims (vs. longer therapy) before discontinuation were strong predictors of follow-on therapy initiation versus no follow-on therapy.

conclusionMany patients stopping denosumab do not receive follow-on therapy. Proactive follow-up and strong clinical communication would reduce treatment gaps and prompt follow-on therapy after discontinuation.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabOsteoporosisAgedAged, 80 and overDiphosphonatesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMedicareOsteoporotic FracturesUnited StatesWithholding TreatmentBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDiphosphonatesAged patientsBisphosphonatesBone density conservation agentsDenosumabOsteoporosisZoledronic acid

Identifiers

PMID41143882
PMCPMC12744900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.