Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143833›Full record

ReviewJAMA internal medicine2025

Supporting Shared Decision-Making in Life-Altering Kidney Therapy Decisions for Older Adults: A Review.

Fahad Saeed, Areeba Jawed, Shena Gazaway, Rasheeda K Hall, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Barrett Bowling, Jane O Schell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. ASN Kidney Health Guidance on Conservative Management in People with Kidney Failure.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fahad SaeedDepartment of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Areeba JawedDivision of Nephrology and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Shena GazawaySchool of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Rasheeda K HallDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Michele Klein-FedyshinHealth Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Barrett BowlingDurham Veterans Affairs Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System (VAHCS), Durham, North Carolina.
Jane O SchellSection of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of Renal-Electrolyte, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Outcomes of a Palliative Care Intervention to Improve Kidney Therapy-Decision Making for Older People with Advanced CKDR01AG082891 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Fahad Saeed · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
Pilot Testing of a Communication Intervention to Promote Shared Dialysis Decision Making in Older Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (DIAL-SDM Trial)K23DK121939 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SAEED, FAHAD · 2020 to 2023
$839k
An Optimization trial of a stakeholder-enhanced intervention to improve the decisional partnership of Chronic Kidney Disease dyads using the multiphase optimization strategy: Project ImPart.K23DK134756 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Shena Gazaway · 2023 to 2026
$674k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG082891NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK121939NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK134756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Older adults represent the fastest-growing population initiating dialysis in the US. For older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), initiating dialysis is often the default option presented, as they are often ineligible for kidney transplant. This approach may not align with many older patients' goals, who often prioritize quality of life over life extension. Further, many older patients report not being informed about all available kidney therapy options. This narrative review provides a guide for primary care clinicians to collaborate closely with older adults, their families, and nephrologists to promote shared kidney therapy decision-making in advanced CKD. Observations: Several options exist for older adults with advanced CKD. These include kidney transplant, which aims to prolong life while preserving a good quality of life; dialysis, which focuses on prolonging life; and conservative kidney management, which forgoes dialysis and transplant, prioritizing quality of life over life prolongation. Shared decision-making is a collaborative process in which clinicians and patients jointly develop a care plan based on the best available evidence, the patient's goals and prognosis, and a careful weighing of the pros and cons of each kidney therapy option. This process supports patients to achieve informed and goal-concordant decisions regarding CKD management after careful deliberation. For patients with decisional uncertainty or a desire to maintain the status quo, a time-limited trial of dialysis or a deciding not to decide approach, respectively, can be implemented. Conclusions and Relevance: Shared decision-making is essential to help older adults with advanced CKD understand therapy options and make goal-concordant decisions. Primary care clinicians' collaboration with nephrologists to promote shared decision-making and deliver patient-centered, coordinated care is critically important.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedHumansKidney TransplantationQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID41143833
PMCPMC13064947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.