Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143468›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Intersectional Disparities in Digital Health and Mental Health Service Use Among US Youth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a National Survey.

Meghan Romanelli, Carolina Vélez-Grau, Julien Rouvere, Sarah F Porter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meghan RomanelliSchool of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3633-8826
Carolina Vélez-GrauSchool of Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-1906
Julien RouvereDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9468-564X
Sarah F PorterSchool of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6384-2211

Funding

Youth Mentor-Led Brief Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Youth Suicide PreventionK23MH137405 · NIMH · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI VÉLEZ-GRAU, CAROLINA · 2024 to 2025
$788k
Optimizing Engagement in Digital Mental Health Services among Sexual and Gender Minority ConsumersK01MH131795 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Meghan Romanelli · 2023 to 2026
$609k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH131795NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH137405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexual minority youth, particularly sexual minority youth of color, report elevated mental health challenges and persistent barriers to care. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated these disparities and catalyzed a shift toward digital health and digital mental health services. This rapid transition has made it challenging to understand digital exclusion and the digital divide.

objectiveThis cross-sectional study identified the prevalence of digital health and digital mental health service use among US adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic and examined heterogeneity by sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, and their intersection.

methodsNationally representative data were obtained from the 2021 Adolescent Behaviors and Experiences Survey (N=7705). Weighted distributions of digital health and digital mental health use were calculated, and modified Poisson regression models estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) by sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, and their intersection.

resultsAcross the sample, digital health and digital mental health use were 25.8% and 8.5%, respectively. (All percentages reported are weighted estimates.) Digital mental health use was 5.6% among heterosexual participants and 18.1% among all sexual minority youth. In adjusted models, sexual minority subgroups had higher prevalence of digital mental health use than heterosexual peers (lesbian, gay, and bisexual [LGB]: aPR 2.60; sexually diverse: aPR 2.41; all P≤.05). This pattern held among White, Black or African American, and multiracial LGB participants. Digital mental health use was 10.2% among White participants and ranged from 4.8% to 15% among racially or ethnically minoritized participants. Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, and Asian or Pacific Islander participants had lower prevalence of digital mental health use than White peers overall (Black or African American: aPR 0.70; Hispanic or Latino: aPR 0.55; Asian or Pacific Islander: aPR 0.48; all P≤.05) and among sexual minority youth (Black or African American: aPR 0.60; Hispanic or Latino: aPR 0.35; Asian or Pacific Islander: aPR 0.23; all P≤.05). Racial and ethnic disparities in digital mental health use were pronounced among LGB (Hispanic or Latino: aPR 0.52; P≤.05) and sexually diverse participants (Black or African American: aPR 0.36; Hispanic or Latino: aPR 0.17; Asian or Pacific Islander: aPR 0.10; all P≤.05), but not heterosexual participants. Digital health use did not differ by sexual orientation. However, Black or African American and Hispanic or Latino participants had lower prevalence of digital health use than White peers (28.8%) overall (Black or African American: aPR 0.76; Hispanic or Latino: aPR 0.78; all P≤.05) and among heterosexual (Black or African American: aPR 0.73; Hispanic or Latino: aPR 0.80; all P≤.05) and sexual minority youth participants (Hispanic or Latino: aPR 0.75).

conclusionsDigital platforms offer promise for expanding access to mental health care among sexual minority youth, but persistent inequities must be addressed. Cocreation with lived-experience experts may be critical to ensure digital services are trusted, inclusive, and accessible for all youth.

Indexed as

COVID-19Healthcare DisparitiesMental Health ServicesAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesDigital HealthEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Sexual and Gender MinoritiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesCOVID-19digital health servicesdigital inclusiondigital mental health servicessexual minority youth

Identifiers

PMID41143468
PMCPMC12603589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.