Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143465›Full record

ArticleJMIR serious games2025

Effect of Gamification on Task Engagement During an Eye-Tracking Test Battery in 5-Year-Old Children Born Preterm: Observational Study.

Andrea De Gobbis, Marta Malavolta, Nathalie De Beukelaer, Els Ortibus, Aleksander Sadikov, Vida Groznik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR serious games, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea De GobbisNEUS Diagnostics d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3993-5116
Marta MalavoltaFaculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-0822
Nathalie De BeukelaerDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7800-3354
Els OrtibusDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1020-4408
Aleksander SadikovNEUS Diagnostics d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-3556
Vida GroznikNEUS Diagnostics d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-926X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies suggest that eye movements during tasks reflect cognitive processes and that analysis of eye movements using eye-tracking devices can identify developmental impairments in young children. Maintaining engagement during eye-tracking assessments in young children is challenging and often results in data loss due to distractions. This leads to incomplete recordings and repeated measurements, which can be taxing for young children. Gamification of eye-tracking procedures for cognitive diagnosis might increase engagement and help mitigate these problems, but its effects should be studied and quantified.

objectiveThis study compares a standard eye-tracking test battery designed by us with a gamified cartoon version to evaluate the effectiveness of gamification in reducing data loss. The gamified test incorporated child-friendly visuals to provide context for the stimuli presented. The study has two objectives: (1) to compare the data quality between the two versions of the test and (2) to investigate whether, by applying a dynamic stopping criterion to both tests, the higher data quality of the gamified procedure allows earlier test termination.

methodsData were collected in a cohort of 25 children born preterm aged 5 years. We measured data quality using a metric derived from robustness, which we defined as the lost data index (LDI), along with task completion rates and feedback from participants. Data analyses were performed as follows: (1) direct comparison of the LDI for the two tests and (2) demonstrating that, although the base gamified test is longer, applying a stopping criterion results in comparable durations. The stopping criterion was based on the number of tasks with an LDI value below a predefined threshold.

resultsThe gamified version demonstrated a significant reduction in average LDI compared with the standard version in the first (P<.001, Mann-Whitney U test) and second (P=.01, U test) quarters of the test. In addition, a lower rate of missing values, concentrated at the beginning of the tests, allowed the cartoon test to be stopped after fewer tasks. This, together with the longer tasks of the cartoon test, resulted in comparable test lengths for all thresholds measured by area under the curve (P=.50, U test) and at the chosen threshold of 0.2 LDI (P=.21, U test). Increased engagement was further supported by positive feedback, with 79% (11/14) of the participants who provided feedback preferring the gamified version.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the potential of serious games in eye-tracking-based cognitive assessments for 5-year-old children born preterm. Specifically, gamification might reduce missing values and increase participant engagement, leading to higher retention rates and more effective tests, without significantly lengthening testing procedures.

Indexed as

childdata accuracyeye movement data analysiseye-trackinggamificationpremature birth

Identifiers

PMID41143465
PMCPMC12603587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.