Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143267›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Climaterna: A decade of daily data on births, deaths, pollution and climate variables for all municipalities in Brazil.

Cristiano Torezzan, Camila Ferreira Soares, Breno Bernard Nicolau de França, Priscila Pereira Coltri, Everton Emanuel Campos de Lima, Alexandre Cândido Xavier, Jaqueline Nichi, Charles M'poca Charles, Negli René Gallardo-Alvarado, Sergio Floquet and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Analysis of mode of delivery according to race and ethnicity in Brazil: Application of the Robson Classification.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Cristiano TorezzanSchool of Applied Sciences (FCA), Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Camila Ferreira SoaresCollege of Philosophy and Human Sciences (IFCH), Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Breno Bernard Nicolau de FrançaInstitute of Computing (IC), Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Priscila Pereira ColtriCenter for Meteorological and Climatic Research Applied to Agriculture, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Everton Emanuel Campos de LimaCollege of Philosophy and Human Sciences (IFCH), Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre Cândido XavierDepartment of Rural Engineering, Agricultural Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Alegre, ES, Brazil.
Jaqueline NichiUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Charles M'poca CharlesUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Negli René Gallardo-AlvaradoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Sergio FloquetUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Gabriel Moreira MottaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Matheus Alves de AndradeUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Mateus Samuel RissoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Malcolm Dos Reis Alves PereiraUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Guilherme Almussa Leite TorresUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Kevin HyslopUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Dimitri de Oliveira SilvaUniversidade de São Paulo, USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Oluwafunmilola Deborah AweUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Caio Simplicio ArantesUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Valter Lacerda de Andrade JúniorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Rodolfo de Carvalho PacagnellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article describes a comprehensive dataset integrating public data from validated sources, including the Mortality Information System (SIM) and the Live Births Information System (SINASC) of DATASUS, the Brazilian Daily Weather Gridded Data (BR-DWGD), and pollution data from the CMIP6 models platform. Additionally, for the state of São Paulo, we incorporated air pollution data from monitoring stations managed by CETESB (Environmental Company of the State of São Paulo). The dataset comprises anonymized microdata on all births and deaths across Brazilian municipalities, with daily granularity from 2010 to 2022. It also includes annual climate (2010 to March 2024) and pollution data (2010 to 2023) for the same geographic scope. This integrated dataset enables diverse analyses exploring the relationships between health and environmental variables, particularly focusing on maternal and neonatal health outcomes in Brazil. By combining data from officially validated sources, this dataset not only supports robust research in demography, population studies, epidemiology, public health, and environmental sciences but also contributes to the democratization of access to information. Data were collected from public databases and processed using RStudio and Python. Climate data (BR-DWG) were produced through statistical corrections and interpolation of measurements from meteorological stations and rain gauges across Brazil.

Indexed as

Climate analysisDataset integrationEnvironmental variablesEpidemiologyMaternal healthNeonatal outcomesPollution dataPublic health

Identifiers

PMID41143267
PMCPMC12545826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.