Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143252›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine open2025

Pharmacogenomics in pediatric oncology: Australian adolescent or young adult and caregiver perspectives.

Claire Moore, Emma F Magavern, Marliese Alexander, Safeera Y Hussainy, Tracey Danaher, Rishi S Kotecha, Kyall Homberg, Marion K Mateos, Sophie Jessop, Tayla Stenta and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Claire MooreCancer Therapies, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Emma F MagavernWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Marliese AlexanderPharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Australia.
Safeera Y HussainyPharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Australia.
Tracey DanaherMonash University, Caufield East, Australia.
Rishi S KotechaDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Kyall HombergKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Sydney, Australia.
Marion K MateosKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Sydney, Australia.
Sophie JessopChildren's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Tayla StentaCancer Therapies, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Dhrita KhatriCancer Therapies, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Elizabeth WilliamsCancer Therapies, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Roxanne DyasCancer Therapies, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Julian StolperCancer Therapies, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
David A ElliottCancer Therapies, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Rachel ConyersCancer Therapies, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Preemptive pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing in pediatric oncology patients could reduce toxicity and improve efficacy of medications yet remains underutilized. Consumer identified implementation barriers have not been extensively explored nor included adolescent or young adult (AYA) patient perspectives. This study describes Australian pediatric oncology consumer perspectives on PGx testing, elucidating barriers to implementation. Methods: A theory-informed, quantitative survey was used to assess knowledge and attitudes toward PGx in 38 AYA patients and 66 caregivers. Additionally, AYAs were assessed for autonomy using a validated scale. Results: Participants viewed PGx testing positively, and 98% at least "somewhat agreed" that they would want to be tested/want their child to be tested. Concerns were identified in both AYA patient and caregiver groups, primarily the possibility of insurance discrimination and data security. Almost 90% of AYA patients expressed a desire for direct involvement in decisions regarding their PGx testing. However, the mean autonomy score (15.2) suggests that many felt they were not consistently given the opportunity to participate in decisions about their own lives. Conclusion: Despite positive attitudes toward PGx testing, pediatric oncology consumers still have some concerns that need to be addressed for successful implementation. Additionally, AYA patients should be included in PGx processes and implementation design.

Indexed as

AdolescentsCaregiversOncologyPharmacogeneticsYoung adult

Identifiers

PMID41143252
PMCPMC12552976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.