ArticleGenetics in medicine open2025
Pharmacogenomics in pediatric oncology: Australian adolescent or young adult and caregiver perspectives.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Australian Public's Awareness, Knowledge and Perspectives Towards Pharmacogenomics: A Nationwide Survey, and Semi-Structured Interviews.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Preemptive pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing in pediatric oncology patients could reduce toxicity and improve efficacy of medications yet remains underutilized. Consumer identified implementation barriers have not been extensively explored nor included adolescent or young adult (AYA) patient perspectives. This study describes Australian pediatric oncology consumer perspectives on PGx testing, elucidating barriers to implementation. Methods: A theory-informed, quantitative survey was used to assess knowledge and attitudes toward PGx in 38 AYA patients and 66 caregivers. Additionally, AYAs were assessed for autonomy using a validated scale. Results: Participants viewed PGx testing positively, and 98% at least "somewhat agreed" that they would want to be tested/want their child to be tested. Concerns were identified in both AYA patient and caregiver groups, primarily the possibility of insurance discrimination and data security. Almost 90% of AYA patients expressed a desire for direct involvement in decisions regarding their PGx testing. However, the mean autonomy score (15.2) suggests that many felt they were not consistently given the opportunity to participate in decisions about their own lives. Conclusion: Despite positive attitudes toward PGx testing, pediatric oncology consumers still have some concerns that need to be addressed for successful implementation. Additionally, AYA patients should be included in PGx processes and implementation design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.