ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Attention-based Transformer-LSTM architecture for early diagnosis and staging of early-stage Parkinson's disease using fNIRS data.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder requiring early diagnosis and accurate staging for optimal treatment outcomes. Traditional clinical assessments have limitations in objectivity and reproducibility. Objective: To develop and validate an Attention-based Transformer-LSTM hybrid deep learning model (ATLAS-PD) for classifying early-stage PD patients (H&Y stages 1-2) and healthy controls using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 240 participants: 80 healthy controls, 80 H&Y stage 1 PD patients, and 80 H&Y stage 2 PD patients. fNIRS data were collected during a pegboard task using a 22-channel system covering prefrontal cortex regions. To address task-specific bias, a pilot complementary gait imagery task was performed on a subset of 60 participants (20 per group), with additional ROC AUC analysis. The ATLAS-PD model was compared with traditional machine learning algorithms including Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Back-Propagation Neural Network. McNemar's test and bootstrap resampling were conducted to assess superiority. Interpretability analysis was conducted using permutation importance to quantify channel contributions, with regional aggregation and channel ranking to identify neurophysiologically relevant patterns. Additionally, t-SNE (t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding) dimensionality reduction was applied to visualize the feature space clustering. Results: The ATLAS-PD model achieved an accuracy of 88.9% (95% CI: 0.808-0.970), demonstrating superior robustness and generalization compared to traditional approaches. While SVM showed higher accuracy (92.6, 95% CI: 0.869-0.983) on the test set, it exhibited significant performance degradation under noise conditions (accuracy dropped to 45.2% at Conclusion: ATLAS-PD provides an objective, non-invasive tool for early PD diagnosis and staging in H&Y stages 1-2. The inclusion of complementary tasks and statistical validations enhances its clinical applicability. Future studies should validate the model's performance in more advanced PD stages to enhance clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.