Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143243›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025

Clinical validation of a plasma-based antibody-free LC-MS method for identifying CSF amyloid positivity in mild cognitive impairment.

José Antonio Allué, Leticia Sarasa, Noelia Fandos, Ricardo Gonzalo, Rubén Sabido-Vera, Jorge Loscos, Judith Romero, Adrián Sánchez, Jose Terencio, Jordi A Matias-Guiu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

José Antonio AlluéAraclon Biotech-Grifols, Zaragoza, Spain.
Leticia SarasaAraclon Biotech-Grifols, Zaragoza, Spain.
Noelia FandosAraclon Biotech-Grifols, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ricardo GonzaloScientific Innovation Office, Grifols S.A., Barcelona, Spain.
Rubén Sabido-VeraScientific Innovation Office, Grifols S.A., Barcelona, Spain.
Jorge LoscosAraclon Biotech-Grifols, Zaragoza, Spain.
Judith RomeroAraclon Biotech-Grifols, Zaragoza, Spain.
Adrián SánchezAraclon Biotech-Grifols, Zaragoza, Spain.
Jose TerencioAraclon Biotech-Grifols, Zaragoza, Spain.
Jordi A Matias-GuiuHospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Gerard Piñol-RipollUnitat de Trastorns Cognitius, Hospital Universitari Santa Maria, Lleida, Spain.
María Pascual-LucasAraclon Biotech-Grifols, Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The recent approval of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in several countries has accelerated the need for affordable, simple and scalable methods to identify patients who are eligible for treatment with the new disease-modifying therapies (DMT). Blood-based biomarkers offer less invasive alternatives to established gold standards. We have clinically validated a predictive model combining plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype and age, in two independent real-world cohorts to identify brain amyloid deposition. Methods: We conducted a clinical validation study involving 450 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from two real-world cohorts (HCSC, Madrid, Spain and HUSM, Lleida, Spain). Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 was measured by ABtest-MS, an antibody-free liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method. CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau181/Aβ42 (gold standards) were quantified with the Lumipulse Results: In the HCSC, HUSM, external validation and combined analysis, AUCs were 0.89 (95% confidence intervals-CI: 0.84-0.93), 0.88 (0.84-0.93), 0.88 (0.83-0.92) and 0.88 (0.84-0.91), with corresponding accuracies of 82.3, 81.6, 82.3, and 81.1%, respectively. After the combined analysis, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were established at 87.5%, resulting in cutoff values of 0.30 and 0.67 for the likelihood of amyloid negativity and positivity, respectively, for a prevalence of 62%. Probability values lower than 0.30 indicate low probability of brain amyloid deposition, while values greater than 0.67 indicate high probability. Less than 28% of the participants fell into the intermediate zone. Additional cutoffs were derived for different prevalence values. Predictive model calibration showed excellent agreement with observed data, confirming accurate predictions (slope = 0.98, intercept = -0.01). Conclusion: This predictive model has demonstrated high accuracy for the identification of brain amyloid deposition in patients with MCI. Derived cutoffs enabled over 70% reduction in invasive testing, supporting efficient and cost-effective identification of candidates for DMTs.

Indexed as

ABtest-MSAlzheimer’s diseaseamyloid-βAβ42/Aβ40 ratioblood biomarkersmass spectrometrymild cognitive impairmentvalidation

Identifiers

PMID41143243
PMCPMC12549660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.