Cross-Group Contact Predicts Positive Beliefs About Girls' and Black Peers' STEM Abilities and Occupational Prospects.

Marley B Forbes, Elise M Kaufman, Jonquil Rumberger, Melanie Killen

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Social development (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marley B ForbesHuman Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland College Park.

Elise M KaufmanHuman Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland College Park.

Jonquil RumbergerApplied Developmental and Educational Psychology, Boston College.

Melanie KillenHuman Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland College Park.

Funding

An Intervention to Promote Positive Peer Relationships and Reduce Prejudice and Bias in ChildhoodR01HD093698 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI KILLEN, MELANIE ANN · 2019 to 2022

$1.6M

NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093698

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality forms of contact, such as cross-group play and friendships, have been identified as particularly effective for promoting positive beliefs toward outgroup peers. Relations between children's cross-group play experiences and their beliefs about peers' math and science competencies and high-status occupational prospects have not yet been examined. Understanding these relations is important given that children from minoritized groups continue to face exclusion and bias in these domains. The present study examined the associations between children's (

Indexed as

intergroup contactprejudice reductionstatusstereotypes

Identifiers

PMID41143235

DOI10.1111/sode.12776

PMCPMC12547880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceTDM

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.