ArticleNature machine intelligence2025
Predicting the conformational flexibility of antibody and T cell receptor complementarity-determining regions.
Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Structural T-Cell Receptor Analysis in the Age of Machine Learning.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Structure-based TCR-pMHC binding prediction and generalization to unseen peptides.npj drug discovery · 2026Article
- Efficient generation of epitope-targeted antibodies with Germinal.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Adaptive Disorder as the Hallmark of Nanobodies Antigen-Binding Loops.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- DeepRank-Ab: a scoring function for antibody-antigen complexes based on geometric deep learning.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Structural quality-tier assessment for TCR-pMHC functional enrichment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Enhancing antibody-antigen interaction prediction with atomic flexibility.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many proteins are highly flexible and their ability to adapt their shape can be fundamental to their functional properties. For example, the flexibility of antibody complementarity-determining region (CDR) loops influences binding affinity and specificity, making it a key factor in understanding and designing antigen interactions. With methods such as AlphaFold, it is possible to computationally predict a single, static protein structure with high accuracy. However, the reliable prediction of structural flexibility has not yet been achieved. A major factor limiting such predictions is the scarcity of suitable training data. Here we focus on predicting the structural flexibility of functionally important antibody and T cell receptor CDR3 loops. To this end, we constructed ALL-conformations by extracting CDR3s and CDR3-like loop motifs from all structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank. This dataset comprises 1.2 million loop structures representing more than 100,000 unique sequences and captures all experimentally observed conformations of these motifs. Using this dataset, we develop ITsFlexible, a deep learning tool with graph neural network architecture. We trained the model to binary classify CDR loops as 'rigid' or 'flexible' from inputs of antibody structures. ITsFlexible outperforms all alternative approaches on our crystal structure datasets and successfully generalizes to molecular dynamics simulations. We also used ITsFlexible to predict the flexibility of three CDRH3 loops with no solved structures and experimentally determined their conformations using cryogenic electron microscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.