Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143207›Full record

ArticleNature machine intelligence2025

Predicting the conformational flexibility of antibody and T cell receptor complementarity-determining regions.

Fabian C Spoendlin, Monica L Fernández-Quintero, Sai S R Raghavan, Hannah L Turner, Anant Gharpure, Johannes R Loeffler, Wing K Wong, Alexander Bujotzek, Guy Georges, Andrew B Ward and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adaptive Disorder as the Hallmark of Nanobodies Antigen-Binding Loops.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fabian C SpoendlinDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3006-6217
Monica L Fernández-QuinteroDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, San Diego, CA USA.
Sai S R RaghavanDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, San Diego, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2575-2685
Hannah L TurnerDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, San Diego, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4745-8057
Anant GharpureDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, San Diego, CA USA.
Johannes R LoefflerDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, San Diego, CA USA.
Wing K WongLarge Molecule Research, Roche Pharma and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4029-6902
Alexander BujotzekLarge Molecule Research, Roche Pharma and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5052-0221
Guy GeorgesLarge Molecule Research, Roche Pharma and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
Andrew B WardDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, San Diego, CA USA.
Charlotte M DeaneDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1388-2252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many proteins are highly flexible and their ability to adapt their shape can be fundamental to their functional properties. For example, the flexibility of antibody complementarity-determining region (CDR) loops influences binding affinity and specificity, making it a key factor in understanding and designing antigen interactions. With methods such as AlphaFold, it is possible to computationally predict a single, static protein structure with high accuracy. However, the reliable prediction of structural flexibility has not yet been achieved. A major factor limiting such predictions is the scarcity of suitable training data. Here we focus on predicting the structural flexibility of functionally important antibody and T cell receptor CDR3 loops. To this end, we constructed ALL-conformations by extracting CDR3s and CDR3-like loop motifs from all structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank. This dataset comprises 1.2 million loop structures representing more than 100,000 unique sequences and captures all experimentally observed conformations of these motifs. Using this dataset, we develop ITsFlexible, a deep learning tool with graph neural network architecture. We trained the model to binary classify CDR loops as 'rigid' or 'flexible' from inputs of antibody structures. ITsFlexible outperforms all alternative approaches on our crystal structure datasets and successfully generalizes to molecular dynamics simulations. We also used ITsFlexible to predict the flexibility of three CDRH3 loops with no solved structures and experimentally determined their conformations using cryogenic electron microscopy.

Indexed as

BiologicsStructural biology

Identifiers

PMID41143207
PMCPMC12552124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.