ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2025
Obstacles during training of pregnant doctors in Germany before and after COVID-19: is there a need for change?
Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: With the growing proportion of female practitioners in the medical field, management of pregnant medical doctors is an increasingly important concern. The 2018 amendments to the German Maternity Protection Act stipulate that pregnant doctors and students can and should be permitted to safely continue their work under strict protective measures. Despite these measures, the reality is that pregnancy still results in limits on professional advancement and attainment for many physicians. To improve this situation, we analyzed the current situation in Germany. Based on our analysis, we identified some areas in need of improvement and offered recommendations. Methods: We performed a nationwide online survey that was sent to medical doctors and students via the physicians' union Marburger Bund members' mailing list. The survey's main focus was on which kinds of clinical duties the pregnant doctors were assigned to, subdivided into four different time periods (under the previous and amended Maternity Protection Act, during COVID-19 pandemic and after), from 2016 to 2022. Results: Our survey included 4,748 female medical doctors and students, with a balanced distribution across the four different time periods. The most striking restriction reported by our participants was a ban on performing surgeries and invasive procedures, an experience reported by 57-65 % of pregnant doctors and medical students before the COVID-19 pandemic and nearly 80 % since the pandemic. In addition, since the COVID-19 pandemic, a complete employment ban has been enforced upon nearly 50 % of the pregnant doctors. More than 50 % of pregnant doctors considered their careers to have been obstructed or curtailed by their pregnancies prior to the pandemic, with that number growing to two-thirds since the pandemic. Conclusions: Pregnancy negatively impacts doctors' training and careers. Many women are not allowed to perform surgeries and invasive procedures, even while some of these practitioners report that they wish to and are capable of continuing their work. Change is needed to support enthusiastic young female doctors and students and enable them to maintain their skills and professional advancement during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.