Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143108›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2025

Prevalence of central sensitisation associated symptoms and associations with treatment outcomes in surgical, interventional and injection-based treatment for patients with chronic spinal pain.

Mario Giuseppe Zotti, Keenan Janfada-Balov, William Roger Peters, Luke C Smith, Evelyne Rathbone, Allan Stirling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mario Giuseppe ZottiBond University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2385-3914
Keenan Janfada-BalovBond University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, Australia.
William Roger PetersBond University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5745-5231
Luke C SmithGold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Evelyne RathboneBond University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, Australia.
Allan StirlingBond University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of symptoms potentially related to central sensitisation (CS) in patients with spinal pain and explore its association with patient-reported treatment outcomes. Methods: This study was designed as a single-centre prospective cohort study evaluating 496 patients undergoing surgical and non-surgical management for spinal pain between 2020 and 2023. Patients with symptoms lasting more than three months were assessed for symptoms associated with CS using the validated Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) before treatment. Treatment satisfaction was then assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Complete data on patient demographics were available for 492 patients. Results: The prevalence of a CSI score of 40+ was 49.9%. Non-surgical patients had a higher median CSI score (42, IQR: 32-49) compared to surgical patients (34.5, IQR: 24-48) ( Conclusions: Overall, high CSI scores were common in patients with chronic spinal pain and were significantly associated with treatment dissatisfaction. Higher CSI scores should be considered when selecting treatment and managing patient expectations.

Indexed as

back paincentral sensitisationcentral sensitisation inventorysatisfactionSpinesurgery

Identifiers

PMID41143108
PMCPMC12547141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.