ReviewDigital health
Design, implementation, and evaluation of complex telenutrition interventions used for diabetes self-management and monitoring.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The global increase in diabetes prevalence has heightened the need for interventions focused on health promotion, prevention, management, and clinical monitoring. The challenges for affected individuals and health professionals are numerous, including monitoring diet, physical activity, medication adherence, and blood glucose levels. Objective: This article aims to describe the current state of knowledge on the processes of design, implementation, and evaluation of complex telenutrition interventions used for diabetes self-management and monitoring with a health professional, with the goal of improving adherence, usability, and sustained use. Methods: Research was conducted using the MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases, limited to articles in English and French on the development or evaluation of complex telehealth interventions for type 2 diabetes or pre-diabetes. Three reviewers independently selected each of the articles, and the principal researcher analyzed them. Results: The findings reveal strong end-user involvement, including patients and various health professionals, in the design and evaluation of digital tools, promoting multidisciplinary diabetes management. Telehealth interventions were designed to be used across various platforms and devices, enhancing accessibility. The analysis highlights the importance of ease of use of monitoring technologies, with a trend toward automation and integration with wearable devices for simplified monitoring and rapid adjustments. The analysis also emphasizes the need for rigorous usability evaluations to ensure that technologies meet user needs. Interventions that incorporated theoretical models of behavior change tended to show high levels of user satisfaction and adoption and encouraged patient engagement in managing their condition. Conclusion: This review reveals that complex telenutrition interventions represent a significant advancement for diabetes management. They enable close collaboration between patients and health professionals, enhancing effective diabetes self-management through more accessible and user-friendly digital platforms. The results highlight the importance of user-centered design of telehealth solutions for the success of these initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.