ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Evaluating cardiac noise correction approaches for non-invasive electrophysiology of the human spinal cord.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spinal cord is an important component of the central nervous system for the processing of sensorimotor information transmitted between the body and the brain. Electrospinography (ESG) is the most accessible non-invasive technique for recording spinal signals in humans, but the detrimental impact of physiological noise (mostly of cardiac nature) has prevented widespread adoption. Here, we aim to address this issue by examining various denoising algorithms for cardiac artefact reduction-including approaches based on principal component analysis (PCA), independent component analysis (ICA), signal space projection (SSP), canonical correlation analysis (CCA), and denoising separation of sources (DSS). We observed that in situations where large number of spinal electrodes are used, ICA and SSP offer the best results in terms of balancing the removal of noise and preserving neural information of interest. In cases where only a small number of electrodes are available, an approach based on PCA is deemed helpful. Finally, we also approached this issue from a signal-enhancement perspective by applying CCA and DSS directly to signals of interest, namely spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs, especially the N13 and N22 components in the cervical and lumbar spinal cord, respectively). We observed that in cases where extensive electrode arrays are used in the context of task-based designs, CCA reveals clear evoked spinal potentials even with single-trial resolution. Taken together, there are several appropriate algorithms for physiological noise removal and/or signal enhancement in ESG, rendering this an accessible and easy-to-use technique for non-invasive assessments of human spinal cord function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.