Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143064›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational immunology2025

Targeting the tumor microenvironment in cholangiocarcinoma to improve immune checkpoint blockade: potential strategies and translational pre-clinical models.

Maria-Danae Jessel, Owen McGreevy, Lauryn McReynolds, Lekh N Dahal, Timothy Gilbert, Hassan Z Malik, Christopher E Goldring, Laura E Randle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria-Danae JesselThe Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology The University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2999-9914
Owen McGreevyThe Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology The University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-0207
Lauryn McReynoldsThe Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology The University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3323-1409
Lekh N DahalThe Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology The University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8390-6593
Timothy GilbertThe Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology The University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-1897
Hassan Z MalikHepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Royal Liverpool University Hospital Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7730-1774
Christopher E GoldringThe Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology The University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9645-6394
Laura E RandleThe Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology The University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7881-2979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma is a malignancy of significant unmet clinical need with limited therapeutic options. Most patients are diagnosed at advanced or metastatic stages, where surgical resection with curative intent is no longer an option. Gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy has been the standard of care for these patients, remaining unchanged for over a decade. Recently, the addition of the programmed death ligand 1 inhibitor, durvalumab, to this regimen demonstrated an objective response rate of 26.7% in a phase III trial, becoming the new standard of care for advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Although considered a success in cholangiocarcinoma treatment, the results indicate that only a small proportion of patients respond to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging evidence suggests that many cholangiocarcinoma tumors exhibit an immunologically 'cold' tumor microenvironment, characterised by predominance of immunosuppressive immune populations and limited infiltration of cytotoxic T cells, which contributes to their resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the research studies that have employed immunomodulatory strategies in cholangiocarcinoma aimed at priming the tumor microenvironment for a more effective response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. This update will also evaluate the strengths and limitations of current pre-clinical models of cholangiocarcinoma, with emphasis on more advanced translational models. These complex models remain underutilised, hindering the development of novel therapeutic approaches. We suggest that these complex preclinical models may help translation of therapies into clinical practice.

Indexed as

cholangiocarcinomahumanimmunotherapypreclinicaltumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41143064
PMCPMC12552741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.