Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143013›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The synergy between leadership, work regime, and quality-of-life.

Vasco José, Ana Palma-Moreira, Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vasco JoséFaculdade de Ciências Sociais e Tecnologia, Universidade Europeia, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ana Palma-MoreiraFaculdade de Ciências Sociais e Tecnologia, Universidade Europeia, Lisboa, Portugal.
Manuel Au-Yong-OliveiraINESC TEC, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The primary objective of this research was to investigate the relationship between leadership and quality of life and whether this association is moderated by the work regime (remote, hybrid, or in-person). Additionally, we aimed to investigate the relationship between work regime and quality of life, as well as the mediating effect of leadership on this relationship. Methods: A total of 231 individuals working under different work regimes (in-person, hybrid and remote) participated in this study. This study followed a quantitative methodology. Results: Leadership has a positive and significant association with the perception of quality-of-life. The work regime has a significant effect on the perception of quality-of-life and moderates the relationship between transformational leadership and the perception of quality-of-life. The work regime has a significant impact on the perception of leadership. Leadership has a mediating effect on the relationship between the work regime and the perception of quality of life. Discussion: This study demonstrates that technology can be an ally in increasing individual well-being, provided it is accompanied by effective leadership practices tailored to the adopted regime. Employees' perception of quality of life emerges not only because of the conditions adopted, but also from a synergy involving the context (work regime) and management capable of leading in a manner appropriate to the remote or hybrid context.

Indexed as

flexible workleadershipquality of liferemote workwork regime

Identifiers

PMID41143013
PMCPMC12549298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.