Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41143012›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The domain-general and domain-specific cognitive profiles in high and low-achieving Chinese L2 learners.

Qing Xiao, Yue Shi, Dazhi Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qing XiaoDepartment of Language Teaching and Research, Beijing Chinese Language and Culture College, Beijing, China.
Yue ShiSchool of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
Dazhi ChengSchool of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although both general cognitive and domain-specific skills are important for Chinese L2 learning, it remains unclear whether high and low-achieving Chinese L2 learners differ in specific cognitive abilities. This study examines both domain-general and domain-specific cognitive profiles in high and low-achieving Chinese L2 learners. Sixty-four Chinese L2 learners from Southeast Asia were categorized into high-achieving group and low-achieving group based on academic performance and teacher evaluations. The study assessed general cognitive functions, including working memory, attention, and phonological processing, as well as domain-specific skills such as morphological awareness. The results showed that low-achieving Chinese L2 learners performed poorly in phonological processing tasks such as verbal working memory and pitch matching. They also underperform in morphological awareness tasks such as nonword identification and homophone judgment. These findings demonstrated the critical role of both phonological processing and morphological awareness in Chinese L2 learning suggesting potential interventions targeting these cognitive areas to improve learning outcomes for low-achieving Chinese L2 learners.

Indexed as

Chinesecognitive abilitiesmorphological awarenessphonological processingsecond language

Identifiers

PMID41143012
PMCPMC12546249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.