ReviewInternational journal of genomics2025
Mapping the Research Landscape of Exercise and Breast Cancer: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2020 to 2024.
Review in International journal of genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Informational and structural barriers to exercise oncology care in Spain: development of the MOVE-Onco questionnaire and preliminary findings.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Mapping the Research Landscape of Exercise and Breast Cancer: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2020 to 2024.International journal of genomics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Even though there is strong evidence that exercise improves breast cancer patients' quality of life, treatment tolerance, and survival, disparate research initiatives and uneven clinical acceptance underscore the need for a thorough synthesis of trends, partnerships, and gaps. This bibliometric analysis systematically maps the research landscape of exercise and cardiovascular disease (CVD) from 2020 to 2024, aiming to identify trends, influential works, and knowledge gaps in this critical field. Utilizing data from the Web of Science (WoS) and VOSviewer, the study analyzed 314 articles through cocitation, coword, and co-occurrence analyses. Key findings reveal exponential growth in citations, driven by seminal guidelines (e.g., ESC 2021 and WHO 2020) and studies on sedentary behavior and pandemic-related activity changes. The intellectual structure is anchored by three themes: evidence-based guidelines, risk quantification (e.g., dose-response relationships), and behavioral interventions. Dominant journals include the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.